Minudências na pesquisa de mestrado: elementos subjetivos

Abstract

Este ensaio objetiva refletir acerca dos elementos subjetivos que perpassaram toda a pesquisa de mestrado da autora, apontando os elementos invisíveis que estão presentes na produção científica e quase sempre ficam à margem dos resultados apresentados, assim como da percepção dos leitores. Apresenta a forte conexão entre o percurso socializatório da pesquisadora, sua formação profissional, a escolha pelo objeto de estudo no mestrado em educação e a predileção pelo aporte teórico Lahireano na dissertação. Por fim, reflete sobre o contexto da pesquisa de campo na atuação profissional.This essay aims to reflect on the subjective elements that permeated all the author's master's research, pointing out the invisible elements that are present in scientific production and are almost always outside the presented results, as well as the readers' perception. It presents the strong connection between the researcher's socialization path, her professional training, the choice for the object of study in the master's degree in education and the predilection for the Lahirean theoretical contribution in the dissertation. Finally, it reflects on the context of field research in professional practice.This essay aims to reflect on the subjective elements that permeated all the author's master's research, pointing out the invisible elements that are present in scientific production and are almost always outside the presented results, as well as the readers' perception. It presents the strong connection between the researcher's socialization path, her professional training, the choice for the object of study in the master's degree in education and the predilection for the Lahirean theoretical contribution in the dissertation. Finally, it reflects on the context of field research in professional practice.Cet essai vise à réfléchir sur les éléments subjectifs qui ont imprégné toutes les recherches de maîtrise de l'auteur, en soulignant les éléments invisibles qui sont présents dans la production scientifique et sont presque toujours en dehors des résultats présentés, ainsi que la perception des lecteurs. Il présente le lien fort entre le parcours de socialisation de la chercheuse, sa formation professionnelle, le choix de l'objet d'étude à la maîtrise en éducation et la prédilection pour l'apport théorique lahirien dans le mémoire. Enfin, il réfléchit sur le contexte de la recherche de terrain dans la pratique professionnelle.