Comunicando ciência: o uso das redes sociais públicas pelos periódicos científicos brasileiros da Área “Comunicação e Informação”
Carregando...
Tipo
Artigo
Classficação
Nível teórico
Data
2023-12-15
Título do Períodico
RDBCI: Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação
ISSN
1678-765X
Página(s)/e-location
e023025
Idioma(s)
pt, en
Fonte
Fonte
Campinas, SP
21
21
Resumo
Introdução: Em 2002, com a Iniciativa de Acesso Aberto de Budapeste (BOAI), as comunidades científicas de muitos países começavam a apoiar ações em prol do Acesso Aberto ao conhecimento científico. Desde então, outras atitudes surgiram, como a definição de diretrizes para reprodutibilidade dos estudos e abertura de dados de pesquisa, baseadas na realização de pesquisas científicas mais colaborativas e democratização do acesso aos seus resultados, culminando em práticas de Ciência Aberta. Quanto a esta democratização, os periódicos científicos são os canais mais utilizados para a comunicação dos resultados dos estudos, portanto possuem a potencialidade de, também, informar tais resultados ao público não especializado, dando evidência aos cientistas e suas instituições. Objetivo: Analisar o engajamento das postagens realizadas no Instagram, Facebook e Twitter pelos periódicos científicos avaliados com Qualis A1 e A2, pela Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (2017-2020), na área “Comunicação e Informação” e se as postagens possuem conteúdo considerado inteligível ao público não especializado. Metodologia: Levantamento informacional, análise de conteúdo e cálculo de engajamento das páginas e postagens dos periódicos nas referidas redes sociais. Identificaram-se sete periódicos, sendo analisadas 341 postagens realizadas entre agosto de 2022 a janeiro de 2023, das quais 173 foram categorizadas como “Promoção de manuscrito científico, número ou volume”, de interesse do estudo. Resultados: A rede social Facebook tem maior número de seguidores nos perfis de todos os periódicos pesquisados, mas quando se verifica o cálculo de engajamento versus número de seguidores, Instagram e Twitter aparecem com percentual maior de interações. Em todas as redes sociais públicas pesquisas, a ferramenta "comentário" é pouco utilizada. A maioria das postagens do tipo “Promoção de manuscrito científico, número ou volume” são uma imagem com título do artigo e nomes dos autores, com partes do resumo da obra na descrição, com exceção de um periódico que divulga os manuscritos com vídeos dos próprios autores, que explicam o teor da pesquisa.
Conclusão:
Com o cálculo de engajamento das postagens e sua relação com o número de seguidores das páginas, conclui-se que os periódicos possuem potencial para utilizar as redes sociais públicas para alcançar o público leigo, desde que considerem a principal pergunta da divulgação científica: a quem se destina?
Introduction: In 2002, with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI), the scientific community in many countries began to support actions in favor of Open Access to scientific knowledge. Since then, other attitudes have emerged, such as the definition of guidelines for the reproducibility of studies and the opening of research data, based on conducting more collaborative scientific research and democratizing access to its results, culminating in Open Science practices. As for this democratization, scientific journals are the most used channels for communicating the results of studies, therefore they have the potential to also inform such results to the non-specialized public, giving evidence to scientists and their institutions. Objective: To analyze the engagement of posts made on Instagram, Facebook and Twitter by scientific journals evaluated with Qualis A1 and A2, by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (2017-2020), in the “Communication and Information” area and whether the posts have content intelligible to the non-specialized public. Methodology: Informational survey, content analysis and calculation of engagement of journal pages and posts on the aforementioned social networks. Seven journals were identified, and 341 posts made between August 2022 and January 2023 were analyzed, of which 173 were categorized as “Promotion of scientific manuscript, number or volume”, of interest to the study. Results: The social network Facebook has a greater number of followers in the profiles of all the journals surveyed, but when calculating engagement versus number of followers, Instagram and Twitter appear with a higher percentage of interactions. In all public social networks polls, the "comment" tool is little used. Most posts like “Promotion of a scientific manuscript, number or volume” are an image with the title of the article and the names of the authors, with parts of the abstract of the work in the description, with the exception of a journal that publishes the manuscripts with videos of the authors themselves, which explain the content of the research. Conclusion: With the calculation of the engagement of the posts and its relationship with the number of followers of the pages, it is concluded that journals have the potential to use public social networks to reach the lay public, as long as they consider the main question of scientific dissemination: who is it intended for?
Introduction: In 2002, with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI), the scientific community in many countries began to support actions in favor of Open Access to scientific knowledge. Since then, other attitudes have emerged, such as the definition of guidelines for the reproducibility of studies and the opening of research data, based on conducting more collaborative scientific research and democratizing access to its results, culminating in Open Science practices. As for this democratization, scientific journals are the most used channels for communicating the results of studies, therefore they have the potential to also inform such results to the non-specialized public, giving evidence to scientists and their institutions. Objective: To analyze the engagement of posts made on Instagram, Facebook and Twitter by scientific journals evaluated with Qualis A1 and A2, by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (2017-2020), in the “Communication and Information” area and whether the posts have content intelligible to the non-specialized public. Methodology: Informational survey, content analysis and calculation of engagement of journal pages and posts on the aforementioned social networks. Seven journals were identified, and 341 posts made between August 2022 and January 2023 were analyzed, of which 173 were categorized as “Promotion of scientific manuscript, number or volume”, of interest to the study. Results: The social network Facebook has a greater number of followers in the profiles of all the journals surveyed, but when calculating engagement versus number of followers, Instagram and Twitter appear with a higher percentage of interactions. In all public social networks polls, the "comment" tool is little used. Most posts like “Promotion of a scientific manuscript, number or volume” are an image with the title of the article and the names of the authors, with parts of the abstract of the work in the description, with the exception of a journal that publishes the manuscripts with videos of the authors themselves, which explain the content of the research. Conclusion: With the calculation of the engagement of the posts and its relationship with the number of followers of the pages, it is concluded that journals have the potential to use public social networks to reach the lay public, as long as they consider the main question of scientific dissemination: who is it intended for?
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Comunicação científica, Divulgação científica, Periódicos científicos, Ciência Aberta, Scientific communication, Scientific dissemination, Scientific journals, Open Science
Citação
REZENDE, Laura Vilela Rodrigues; DRUMOND, Larissa Bárbara Borges. Comunicando ciência: o uso das redes sociais públicas pelos periódicos científicos brasileiros da Área “Comunicação e Informação”. Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação. Campinas, SP, v. 21, p. e023025. 2023-12-15. 10.20396/rdbci.v21i00.8672917. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/j/rdbci/a/qCMs7JTM7H4qBt6SJmxFbzy/?format=pdf&lang=pt. Acesso em: 2024-05-13