Navegando por Autor "GOELLNER, Silvana Vilodre"

Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
  • Imagem de Miniatura
    Item
    Guardar para não perder: a constituição dos acervos dos Centros de Memória da Educação Física nas universidades federais brasileiras
    (2018) MECEBO, Christiane Garcia; GOELLNER, Silvana Vilodre
    This article analyzes how the process of constitution of collections of ten memory centers of physical education in Brazilian federal universities took place. Its theoretical anchorage falls on Cultural History and for the production of sources an exploratory research was undertaken, visits were made and 36 Oral History interviews were produced. We can see that there is a predominance of textual and iconographic document supports. In half of CMs, the collection consists only of materials linked to its headquarters. Finally, we observe that there is the effort of people, groups and institutions that, in order to avoid loss, have used different strategies to gather, organize, conserve and give access to a documentary set that integrates the Physical Education heritage and related areas.
  • Imagem de Miniatura
    Item
    Proposta de instrumento para avaliação da gestão editorial das revistas científicas brasileiras em educação física e ciências do esporte
    (2015) JOB, Ivone; GOELLNER, Silvana Vilodre
    This work describes the proposal and application of an instrument to evaluate the editorial management of the journals based on given concepts, categories and units of analysis. The instrument was applied in journals in the area of physical education and sport sciences, but can be used in journals from other areas. The research started from the premise that it was necessary to check what the most important criteria for evaluating the management of periodicals. These were grouped into five categories: editorial quality, dissemination, standardization, arbitration procedure and authorship. For each category there are certain indicators, specified according to its definition, implementation and scoring. It was applied in 12 journals in the area and eight reached 80% of the required criteria, and on the results are presented the strengths of all the journals, their characteristics and recommendations for editors and editorial boards. If the standardization and editorial quality categories are well scored on the whole, the same cannot be said of dissemination, arbitration procedure and authorship.