Navegando por Autor "CASTRO, Claudia Rabello de"

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
  • Imagem de Miniatura
    Item
    As representações sociais de profissionais da assistência sobre o Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente: estratégias e argumentos
    (2008) CASTRO, Claudia Rabello de; CASTRO, Monica Rabello de
    The aim of present study was to identify the analyzes of social representations about Children and Adolescents Statute (CAS) that is done by assistance professionals from the City of Campos dos Goitacazes. That law is still polemic and its main controversy is directed to its application to Brazilian reality. After 15 years, the exam of those controversies as well as the investigation, in specific contexts, of range and limits reached by institutions interested on its implementation, remains relevant. The city of Campos gave priority to children assistance and states that CAS is its guidebook. Through articulation of social representations theory, by Serge Moscovici, with new approaches of rhetoric, we intended to validate a methodology of rhetoric analyses of Campos assistance professionals speech. It is assumed that social representations are constantly reconstructed by context demands and that reconstruction is related to commitments established by language shared by social groups. Concepts of agreement, auditorium and argument, as it is stated by Chaïm Perelman, as well as implicit analysis, from Oswald Ducrot were used. Analyzes were oriented by the concept of metaphor, as it was established by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson, and the model of argumentative strategy, based on Argumentative Theory. Results showed some shared aspects in subject representations, that were grouped according its functions inside institutions in: GR - government representations, C - counselors and A - educative agents. RG and C groups have, as central representation, alignment to CSA established directions. The speech of the first ones is focused on value of governmental assistance politics. The last ones put themselves as CAS defenders, worried about valorizing their works, which could loose importance and prestige when faced to society. Far from the other two groups, group A shows CAS unfamiliarity and a nature concept of the law. However, it is the only group where children and adolescents are considered as subjects that are able to change their own reality. For the others the solution of that population problem is focused on governmental actions or in family corrections. Main practice difficulty pointed out by RG and C groups is about Streets Children assistance. They blame family by marginality and consider it a fundamental piece of CAS applicability. For educative agents, CAS appears as something to difficult a corrective practice. Representations about ordinary practices pointed to them means to be submitted to the old law. Diverged aspects of the social representations were also analyzed in all three groups.